Comparability Claims in Content Marketing
In the book Prove It, authors Melanie Deziel and Phil M. Jones teach readers how to use content as a tool to earn audience trust. The authors count five main types of claims owners can make in touting their strengths and comparing themselves to their competitors:
- convenience
- comparability
- commitment
- connection
- competence
(Prior to detailing precise steps involved in each type of claim, I was happy to note, Phil Jones makes a statement that reinforces a content marketing principle we’ve been emphasizing at Say It For You for the past eighteen years:
“One factor that influences trust more than almost anything else is consistency. How you show up consistently is how you become trusted to show up.”
Business owners who are able and willing to maintain consistency and frequency in posting content are rare. There’s a tremendous fall-off rate, with most content marketing initiatives being abandoned months or even weeks after they’re begun. To a significant degree, “showing up” is itself a crucial factor in earning online readers’ trust.
But what happens if you do find gaps between your claims and their provability? The authors (page 28)) suggest two alternatives:
- take steps to adapt and improve your practices and products
- adjust your claims to reflect the more reliable and provable truth
In either case, the authors advise using content marketing to “build a body of evidence”. There are three possible approaches:
- Corroboration – statements by third parties, who might be experts in the field, or actual satisfied users of the product or service
- Demonstration – stories and case studies
- Education – informing consumers helps them feel better prepared to make decisions
Truth is, Phil Jones writes, one type of evidence alone won’t “do it” – it’s best to use a combination of the three.






Follow us online!